VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

Last post 03-10-2010 6:27 by nicowieditz. 28 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (29 items) 1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-27-2010 18:15

    VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    I may have a break in the action this afternoon - but not for more than a day and DON'T want to be 'down' for days sorting thru (or uninstalling and re-installing previous builds) - How have you 'power users' made out with this latest build (4881).  Thanks for any advice.  I have VePro and Play - working together now on a farm unit and of course -don't want to introduce NEW wrinkles there.

     

    Many thanks for your frank advice.

     

    (not my day for software - I am not sure why the first paragraph above is there?????   Please read starting at second paragraph - sorry.)

     

    Rob

     

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 01-28-2010 8:49 In reply to

    • cm
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 12-20-2002
    • vienna
    • Posts 8,748

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    it seems you pasted the text from a word document and some hidden tags ha´d become visible ... edited the HTML ...

     

    basically the 4881 is safe for use.

    by sheer chance i found a bug in the windows installer yesterday evening related to directory manager, but this should only affect users installing VE PRO the first time under a different user account as they had earlier installed another vienna application.

    christian

    and remember: a CRAY is the only computer that runs an endless loop in just four hours ...
  • 01-28-2010 11:38 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    I installed the update and LOST my midi capability - nothing I could do would solve it.  Finally uninstalled it on Main PC (W7) and three farm units (x64) - reinstalled - 4686.  Now midi working again.   I get midi from my RME Multiface.

     

    (FYI - with latest build - I could 'play' the farm unit patches with mouse and hear sound.   I could 'see' midi activity from Main puter - just no connection from main daw to farm units - until rolled back to 4686.)   :(

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 01-31-2010 21:29 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    That happened to me, no midi received over the network, with the previous build, 47-something. I had some corruption in the application, preferences, something and wasn't sure if it wasn't that, but I rolled back after uninstalling and didn't try again. I'm OSX.6.2, Cubase 5.1.1, MacPro to MacPro.

    Beautiful music. ALL DAY LONG...
  • 01-31-2010 22:05 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Yea - rolled back to 4686 and back in biz.  I know the realities of build/fixes - one or two things solved - always the possibility of new issues.  That's reality.   Kind of a pain - but all of us are use to it - not exclusive to VSL.  If fact IMHO they are one of a few companies that have fewer issues on release of software - ofcourse there is always the 'play' issue - but let's not bring that up - we are having such a good day now. :)

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 02-01-2010 13:03 In reply to

    • Karel
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on 01-19-2009
    • Belgium
    • Posts 368

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Some things were changed in the network communication between 4686 & 4881. It sounds to me like you're using different versions on the master and slave systems, which could explain MIDI events not passing through properly.
    Karel Bassez
    Software Engineer
    Vienna Symphonic Library GmbH
  • 02-01-2010 14:43 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    I don't think so.

     

    Two things.

     

     

    1.  All master and slaves had EXACT version/build of vepro installed (with 4881 on ALL machines - midi did not work.)

     

    2.  midi did not work WHEN only running VEPRO on  Master.

     

     

    Unistall update - rolled back to 4686 (again - ALL machines) - all midi communication work as designed.

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 02-02-2010 23:01 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    I had the update installed on master and slave as well. I have only ever seen that in that build. Rolled back to official version, midi is fine.

    Beautiful music. ALL DAY LONG...
  • 02-03-2010 4:51 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Ok - I was starting to think it was just me. :(

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 02-03-2010 18:25 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Same Issue here. Also some interesting overload impact on the CPU's after a couple hours of operation. Old version works fine.

  • 02-03-2010 18:38 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Hey info when you say 'old' are you referring to 4686?  That's the one that works here.  Thanks.

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 02-03-2010 19:07 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Yes, back to Build 4686. Works great again!

  • 02-03-2010 19:34 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    OK - same here - 4686 works as design.

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
  • 02-04-2010 18:29 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    In my 1 day experience 4881 is the best version yet... very good latencies also
  • 02-04-2010 19:16 In reply to

    Re: VePro - build 4881 (Ok to use)

    Ah rats - I was AFRAID you would say that.   So wish the 'midi ghost bug' (at least on mine and a couple of posters here) gets solved so I can try it.  The latencies improvement is of course KEY.

     

     

     

    jvdieks - were you running Play before and can you still?   I am maybe one of the few who is successfull running Play on a farm unit in vepro - just want to be sure on 4881 hasn't changed that (I know the official position of VSL is that Play is NOT supported but....:)

    what would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail?
Page 1 of 2 (29 items) 1 2 Next >